Within the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, some cantons have adopted a separate law on commercial building and premises leases, which imposes new rules for these leases. Ukrainian law provides, depending on the type of property, two main types of rental of real estate: for commercial leases, there are additional rules that are set by local authorities. These provide for additional obligations of the contracting parties that are included in the leases. For hotels, a regular lease is relatively rare. The parties agree either to a management contract or to rent the hotel building with its inventory on the basis of a fixed rent plus rent based on the hotel`s income. In addition, licences are sometimes used with the intention of avoiding the application of landlord and tenant law, although the concept of licensing does not exist legally in this context. As a result, these agreements may be considered leases. The CMD clarified that during the account opening process, the lessor may grant specific conditions to the contract, which will then be referred to the Abu Dhabi City ADM legal department. If the ADM considers that the specific conditions are incompatible with the terms and conditions of the lease and other applicable rules, the ADM may notify the landowner of its refusal of these conditions. Renewal, discount and termination are all done via the Tawtheeq online system.
The first is a lease agreement that grants the right to exclusive ownership for an agreed period. A rental agreement confers on the tenant contractual rights and an interest in the property, which can be transferred to a third party subject to specific restrictions on the lease. The rental of land within a larger unit, such as concessions. B inside a department store, and land rentals are not subject to the Commercial Rent Act or any other law. The parties are free to administer themselves as they see fit. The applicant imposed a refund of expenses on the defendant for goodwill and security, interest and higher costs resulting from a tenancy agreement. It must be decided whether, in the event of termination of the lease between the parties, the plaintiff was entitled to a refund of the good intboursence paid to the defendant. The lease had been leased for four years.
In addition to a bond, the complainant had paid a sum of money as a “good will”. After four months, the applicant surrendered the lease and handed over the property to the defendant. The applicant submitted that the issue was covered by s 19 of the Commercial Real Estate Regulation (SI 676 of 1983), which, in addition to rents and sureties, also required additional payments. Any such payment, which is illegal, should be refunded. If the plaintiff were to lose the “good will” guarantee, this would constitute a tacit penalty that would be contrary to the Contractual Sanctions Act [Chapter 8:04] and would lead to the defendant`s undue enrichment. The defendant argued that s 19 was not applicable; that the applicant did not properly advocate unjust enrichment; and that the payment of the overvalued was not illegal and did not make the rental contract illegal.